Homer and Classical Philology

By Friedrich Nietzsche

Page 11

tells of the contest between Homer and Hesiod,
which proves that when these two names were mentioned people
instinctively thought of two epic tendencies, the heroic and the
didactic; and that the signification of the name "Homer" was included in
the material category and not in the formal. This imaginary contest with
Hesiod did not even yet show the faintest presentiment of individuality.
From the time of Pisistratus onwards, however, with the surprisingly
rapid development of the Greek feeling for beauty, the differences in
the aesthetic value of those epics continued to be felt more and more:
the _Iliad_ and the _Odyssey_ arose from the depths of the flood and
have remained on the surface ever since. With this process of aesthetic
separation, the conception of Homer gradually became narrower: the old
material meaning of the name "Homer" as the father of the heroic epic
poem, was changed into the aesthetic meaning of Homer, the father of
poetry in general, and likewise its original prototype. This
transformation was contemporary with the rationalistic criticism which
made Homer the magician out to be a possible poet, which vindicated the
material and formal traditions of those numerous epics as against the
unity of the poet, and gradually removed that heavy load of cyclical
epics from Homer's shoulders.

So Homer, the poet of the _Iliad_ and the _Odyssey_, is an aesthetic
judgment. It is, however, by no means affirmed against the poet of these
epics that he was merely the imaginary being of an aesthetic
impossibility, which can be the opinion of only very few philologists
indeed. The majority contend that a single individual was responsible
for the general design of a poem such as the _Iliad_, and further that
this individual was Homer. The first part of this contention may be
admitted; but, in accordance with what I have said, the latter part must
be denied. And I very much doubt whether the majority of those who adopt
the first part of the contention have taken the following considerations
into account.

The design of an epic such as the _Iliad_ is not an entire _whole_, not
an organism; but a number of pieces strung together, a collection of
reflections arranged in accordance with aesthetic rules. It is certainly
the standard of an artist's greatness to note what he can take in with a
single glance and set out in rhythmical form. The infinite profusion of
images and incidents in the Homeric epic must force us to admit that
such a wide range of vision is next to impossible. Where, however, a
poet is unable to observe artistically with a single glance,

Last Page Next Page

Text Comparison with The Joyful Wisdom Complete Works, Volume Ten

Page 1
What wonder that much that is unreasonable and foolish thereby comes to light: much wanton tenderness expended even on problems which have a prickly hide, and are not therefore fit to be fondled and allured.
Page 30
Page 44
"And how is it with regard to murder and adultery?"-asked the Englishman with astonishment on learning these things.
Page 47
In magnanimity there is the same amount of egoism as in revenge, but a different quality of egoism.
Page 57
_--It is not unknown to me that there is vulgarity in everything that pleases Southern Europe--whether it be Italian opera (for example, Rossini's and Bellini's), or the Spanish adventure-romance (most readily accessible to us in the French garb of Gil Blas)--but it does not offend me, any more than the vulgarity which one encounters in a walk through Pompeii, or even in the reading of every ancient book: what is the reason of this? Is it because shame is lacking here, and because the vulgar always comes forward just as sure and certain of itself as anything noble, lovely, and passionate in the same kind of music or romance? "The animal has its rights like man, so let it run about freely; and you, my dear fellow-man, are still this animal, in spite of all!"--that seems to me the moral of the case, and the peculiarity of southern humanity.
Page 65
_The Conceit of Artists.
Page 67
Page 73
counterpart and complement of human knowledge and science.
Page 79
_Honesty_ would have disgust and suicide in its train.
Page 88
It is something new in history that knowledge claims to be more than a means.
Page 105
_--We say the strongest things simply, provided people are about us who believe in our strength:--such an environment educates to "simplicity of style.
Page 106
Page 124
_Self-control--_Those moral teachers who first and foremost order man to get himself into his own power, induce thereby a curious infirmity in him--namely, a constant sensitiveness with reference to all natural strivings and inclinations, and as it were, a sort of itching.
Page 125
_The History of each Day.
Page 138
"--_When I look at this age with the eye of a distant future, I find nothing so remarkable in the man of the present day as his peculiar virtue and sickness called "the historical sense.
Page 157
For, to repeat it once more, man, like every living creature, thinks unceasingly, but does not know it; the thinking which is becoming _conscious of itself_ is only the smallest part thereof, we may say, the most superficial part, the worst part:--for this conscious thinking alone _is done in words, that is to say, in the symbols for communication,_ by means of which the origin of consciousness is revealed.
Page 177
Page 178
_ What is Romanticism? Every art and every philosophy may be regarded as a healing and helping appliance in the service of growing, struggling life: they always presuppose suffering and sufferers.
Page 188
Perhaps we philosophers, all of us, are badly placed at present with regard to knowledge: science is growing, the most learned of us are on the point of discovering that we know too little.
Page 198
Then one, dear friend, was swiftly changed to twain, And Zarathustra left my teeming brain.